Hey guys, since it's sometimes tough to know our accuracy, it would be great if we could assemble a calibration team to cross-check our results for confirmation. They're no good if they're wrong, y'know? Of course, we can all imagine how awesome it would be to get reliable results consistently, but nobody I know has mastered it.

Yeah that's the trouble isn't it. I think that we can't just do the calibrations willy-nilly like we've done before. We've got to do it as if it was a scientific experiment and we've got to not care about the answers, purely "objective" so to say.

Sparky and Ash could be one team! "I of myself" need a spare arm to do calibrations with

I've been toying with a bookmark I use as a pendulum. I'll get some strange results with it, like a yes will be forward and back while a no will be side to side. I ask the question and get the pendulum swirling around in circles. Not sure what that means...

As far as muscle testing, we tried that again last week and weren't able to get reliable answers.

Something interesting that I heard John Diamond stated (the guy who Hawkins picked up kinesiology from) is that it's supposed to be a personal thing. That is, you use it to check how the energy corresponds to your particular energy field, but perhaps he was referring more to the idea of foods and whatnot.

Hawkins uses it for things that are more objective and impersonal, so perhaps that's not an issue?