Home
View the profile
Channeling itself calibrates at 195, so is it a non-integrous tool?
He mentions elsewhere to make sure you calibrate the entity on the other side. Perhaps that's more important than the fact that it's being channeled in the first place?
He also calibrates that UFO's are not real and that extra-terrestrials are unreal. In Conversations with God, it is stated otherwise.
I'm also starting to find videos like these and I'm wondering what's really going on.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=497_1203360797
Speaking of channeling, I think we'd calibrated Abraham (of Abraham-Hicks) at like 50,000 or something back in the day, but I have no idea if that number is valid anymore.
Perhaps my favorite channeled being is Bashar. I know this may sound kinda out there, but he's basically an alien who is channeling through a previous incarnation of himself. Oddities aside, the material he presents is fantastic. Then again, the mind can't know Truth and so I really don't know for sure what's up, y'know? I'm just looking for Truth here... Is he legit or what? Hawkins' calibrations suggest otherwise, but I'm not so sure.
If we really are alone in the Universe, holy shit. That just seems really strange to think that we'd be the only ones who exist in the Universe. Plus, Conversations with God would then be totally off.
If aliens really do exist, then Hawkins' calibrations are wrong and if this is the case, what else are his calibrations off about?
----------
The other day I watched one of the Hawkins 2002 lecture videos (thanks Mike!) and he'd calibrated Om and Aum.
It's about 7 minutes into March 2002, Part 3.
Om:
From the video: Calibrates below 540.
Om the mantra, as calibrated in the video: Calibrates over 750.
Om, as calibrated in TvF page 397: calibrates at 740.
Aum:
From the video: Over 300, below 310.
From page 397 of TvF: Calibrates at 210.
---------
The calibrated LoC of Hawkins' books vary when quoted from book to book. Have you guys noticed that?
I think I recall someone somewhere mentioning that calibrations of a movie can change over time, so perhaps books are the same way?
For example, someone's said Hitler's LoC has gone up since his death because people have prayed for him, but does the same thing apply to mantras, movies, and even Hawkins' books?
---------
Other than the fact that "Hawkins says so," I haven't been able to find ANY evidence to say that calibration is an effective and reliable tool in any way whatsoever, and I've experimented with it a lot, even meeting with people who do kinesiology for a living to see if they could correct anything I was doing wrong.
I haven't found anyone who's been able to calibrate successfully and I haven't been able to do it myself. I do feel that there is something behind the technique itself and maybe I'm just doing something wrong, but try as I might, I can't get valid results myself.
Any ideas on all these discrepancies?
